Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jim Buttons's avatar

I think the Jones Act has similarities to the old sugar protection tariffs. In principle they were to protect domestic production of cane sugar but the acres under sugar cultivation was minuscule comparatively and basically only benefitted a small part of Florida. There was easy access to the Carribbean sugar growing markets who had much lower costs but the tarriffs kept those imports at the margin. Why was this small agricutural interest so powerful? The answer lay in the fact that the price of hydrogenated corn starch that was by far the major sweetener by tonnage in US was pinned to....you guessed, the price of Domestic sugar.

The Jones Act is not protecting shipbuilding as your article demonstrates but what it does protect is the shipping interests who control the shipping to and from Hawaii, Alaska, Guam and Puerto Rico; not to mention the railroad companies that have coast to coast monopolies on freight. There are thousands of TEU of empty containers moving up and down and between the US coasts but due to the cabotage rules supported by the Jones Act they cannot be utilized. Ships sail empty by Hawaii back to Asia and could divert at marginal cost but they cannot and Matson, Pasha and others do very well from their protected domain. The cost of everything to the residents of the States involved reflects the extra rent being taken, thanks to the Jones Act.

Expand full comment
Nathan El's avatar

So it seems the gist of this is that national protectionism for industries producing commodities that are very expensive and hard to build and thus dominated by a few large companies is a bad idea because it tends to lead to monopolies. I recommend adding that (or whatever the correct basic takeaway is) as a conclusion to the article for clarity, I had to think about it a little to come up with it and presumably many readers don't come up with it. Otherwise the article is well-explained and presents something I hadn't thought of, so pretty good job.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts