Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J.K. Lund's avatar

Does this include the "subsidy" created by the existence if IP law and protections? Governments can certainly create more incentives to conduct R&D, without additional spending, by simply enforcing patent law.

What I grapple with a great deal at Risk & Progress is how do we best incentivize innovation? The government can dump money via grants and tax credits, but grants are subject to bureaucratic whims and tax credits can be gamed by the private sector. Patents are a double edged sword and prizes require the government to predict which innovations society needs (and value them). None of these options seem to work all that well at all.

Kremer's patent auctions and buyouts seem like a fun thought experiment, but not workable in reality. Do you have any thoughts, assuming that the premise is correct, that we need more R&D, how we can incentivize this in the most effective way possible?

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

Private companies do have insufficient incentives for R+D. But at least they have *some*.

Governments have even worse incentives for R+D. What election has government R+D spending ever been relevant for?

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts